# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1947_S162 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 162 SEMINARIES AND COLLEGES F. The generation of the foregoing effects as broadly and as completely as possible in every ministerial student, but with a liberal recognition of individual differences in the abilities, apti- tudes, and inclinations of students, and a recognition of the conse- quent desirability of providing a controlled freedom in the in- tensive pursuit of certain ends for which the individual presents a special fitness. Wl. Practical Implications Although the objectives here proposed for Synod’s ministerial training schools in large measure enumerate objectives which, in a sense, have long been recognized and accepted, the present statement of objectives does involve some differentiating elements which require clear identification. 1. It represents an effort to state the objectives of Synod’s schools with as much precision and with as much completeness as possible. The compelling need for a definite and complete statement of objectives is indicated by many observations, but especially now by a synodical resolution requiring definite recommendations on a proposal to introduce into the admission standards of the St. Louis Seminary the requirement of a bachelor’s degree from a four-year synodical pre-ministerial training school. In no small degree, the acknowledgment of a need for a formal statement of objectives has been influenced by the conviction that education (in the school sense) cannot support its implied claim to exemption from the stern necessity of observing a fundamental principle, to the uni- versal soundness of which all human experience testifies, namely: except by divine intervention or rare chance, no corporate under- taking can function adequately unless its efforts are consciously directed toward definitely known, clearly stated, and thoroughly accepted objectives, and unless all of its means and methods are organized and controlled with these objectives in view. 2. The present statement places special emphasis upon these objectives which describe the development of the student’s per- sonality in directions other than merely intellectual and lays great stress upon definite spiritual achievements. 3. In the preparation of the present statement a studied effort has been made to avoid an error which, it must be acknowledged, is exceedingly common in educational circles: the often disastrous error of confusing ends and means. Certainly, it cannot be ques- tioned that the curriculum of a school provides only a very remotely indicative statement of objectives. The acceptance of any major portion of the proposed objectives clearly invites careful thought about means and methods which may be employed for their achievement. The objectives here